Talk:Hofstadter sequence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Claimed explicit formula for S(n)[edit]

In the Figure-Figure Sequence section there was a claim that an explicit formula for the sequence S(n) was given by

I have removed this because it is incorrect. The claim first fails at n = 38, when S(38) = 46, but

Gandalf61 (talk) 10:00, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


You're right of course. My apologies. Conchisness (talk) 11:46, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Please check The Pinn generalization formula, it seems different from what appears to be the used one in the page you cite as a source: http://oeis.org/A055748 In particular, I think you switched two of the arguments: F(n - a(n-j) - 1) has become F(n - 1 - a(n-j)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.14.26.44 (talk) 15:45, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]