Talk:Hit Back

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved.  Skomorokh  10:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Retaliatory TurnHit Back

  • It's a kind of title closely related to its original russian title. User:SerdechnyG 17:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Bad translation[edit]

I couldn't figure out what this was supposed to say -- can we get it into proper English before readding it to the article? "In his interview to Trud, he tells that after this film was broadcasted, youngmen at draft offices yeraning and jibbing to serve not elsewhere but only in Airborne Troops[1]."--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"As he also revealed, that after movie was broadcasted, there was a real mass fever among young people in Soviet Union, who wanted to serve only in Airborne Troops." -- SerdechnyG (talk) 13:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps: "He tells in his interview with Trud that after the film was broadcast, there was a noticeable increase of young men trying to get into the Airborne Troops when drafted". --Crusio (talk) 14:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)Ok, that I can read. :-) The wording is still a bit off, but it could go in as is. Should we draw a parallel to Top Gun boosting Naval aviator recruitment in the US? http://articles.latimes.com/1986-07-05/entertainment/ca-20403_1_top-gun --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sounds like a good idea, unless that could be considered as OR or SYNTH... --Crusio (talk) 14:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Let it be so. -- SerdechnyG (talk) 14:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ (in Russian)Liubov' Lebedina "Stuntman" (Trud, № 014, January 27, 2007)


Copyright problem[edit]

This article has been tagged as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) It will likely be deleted after one week unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Major contributions by contributors who have been verified to have violated copyright in multiple articles may be presumptively deleted in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations.

Interested contributors are invited to help clarify the copyright status of this material or rewrite the article in original language at the temporary page linked from the article's face. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. --MER-C 12:42, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hit Back. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]