Talk:History of invertebrate paleozoology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Now that this article is mostly finished, it could benefit from some terrific illustrations, photographs, diagrams or colorful formats. Dr.Bastedo 22:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable source - Muslimheritage.com material[edit]

Content from Muslimheritage.com / FSTC is an unreliable source, as discussed on Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_18#History_of_Science. None of its publications are peer-reviewed, and its authors often exhibit a strong bias and incomplete or flawed citation practices. The site has been used as a source in numerous science and history of science articles to make extraordinary claims about Islamic invention and discovery. I am working to remove these extraordinary claims where they stem directly and solely from a Muslimheritage.com reference. Many of these claims were added by a user who has a history of using flawed sources for extraordinary claims, as discussed on Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Jagged_85. That page details numerous examples where claims from these sources contradict more reliable sources, on a scale which casts the entirety of the material originating from the site into doubt. If you would like to discuss this or any related removal with me, please leave a note on my talk page. Dialectric (talk) 15:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]