Talk:History of economic thought/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article looks very interesting. Many sections have no sources and it is long. As a very rough guide, you'd normally expect a good article this size to have over 150 references. Some of the books here have quite large sections even though they have their own articles. I'd condense it down more, add reliable sources - particularly to those sections that don't have any - and then renominate. Have put on my watchlist and will try and come back and help. Tom (talk) 18:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)