Talk:History of Bengali literature

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of Bengali literature redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 October 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

File:Hungry Generation.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Hungry Generation.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Евгения 53563 (talk) 20:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:6428:2101:C83A:A920:51A8:8771 (talk) 14:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Bengali literature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091203153537/http://www.envf.port.ac.uk/illustration/zineopolis/collection/p/prakalpana.htm to http://www.envf.port.ac.uk/illustration/zineopolis/collection/p/prakalpana.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete[edit]

This page should be deleted as it is the same, if not worse than, the Bengali literature page. No other language has two pages for their literature.UserNumber (talk) 16:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merger would be better than deletion -- see WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:47, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You see @Andrew Davidson:, this page is a downgraded version of the Bengali literature page. Merging will be of no use, nor is there anything to preserve as all the cited and well-sourced information is already found in the page mentioned. UserNumber (talk) 15:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems to be of no use when Bengali literature already covers everything in it. As this article seems to have little more than a list, I believe it should be deleted instead of merged. Ardenter (talk) 05:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrew Davidson:, I think we have reached a consensus that the page should be deleted as the vast majority of contributors to this section of the talk page are agreeing with me. UserNumber (talk) 13:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]