Talk:Health in Guatemala

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Annkat22. Peer reviewers: Kateraz, Patience456, Efoxman42.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Katchyaa.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews[edit]

Hello! I am a fellow student in PJHC, and I think your article is great. I would like to point out that you have especially great formatting and readability. In the future, I would suggest having more sources from different point of views and including more blue links, especially in the history section. Good work! Kateraz (talk) 23:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review 2[edit]

Hi! I think that you have a well written article. The outline is quite comprehensive. I would suggest ensuring that you are unbiased. Also, I suggest that you ensure that your sources are current. Good job! Patience456 (talk) 01:17, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

Great and important article! Your entry is very thorough, and addresses healthcare in Guatemala through an informative and multidimensional lens. The article may still need some revisions in the arenas of neutrality; there are a couple of instances where it seems like the entry may be making a particular argument or claim. Overall though, educational and well-formatted. The illustrations add nice imagery of your topic as well. Efoxman42 (talk) 00:50, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review 4[edit]

You have done a great job creating a comprehensive overview of your topic. The article is visually appealing, and well sourced. It may be in your interest to reconsider some of the section orderings to create a more logical flow for your article. Ensquared (talk) 04:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Medical Pluralism[edit]

Hi!, I just added a short section on Medical pluralism. The link, however, is directed to the page on Alternative Medicine, which seems very one sided against traditional forms of medicine. Thoughts on keeping it v leaving it out? Katchyaa (talk) 19:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]