Talk:Hannibal (2006 TV film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hannibal (2006 TV film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: British / War

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Untitled[edit]

On the BBC site, this movie is named Hannibal: The Man, the Myth, the Mystery instead... --83.70.65.49 12:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, when shown on the BBC, the movie was followed by a documentory which borrowed scenes from the film. It went into further detail about the general and his military accomplishments. The film itself is a quite well-done attempt to portay a historically accurate account of the general. It is quite graphic in it's depiction of the various battles and uses a lot of extras in costume to show many battle and marching scenes. I'm not sure how to incorporate this information into the article so I've placed it here. Canderra 23:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- After just watching it Canderra, I am going to completely disagree with you. It is a film with a historical backdrop, and does a very poor job of being historically accurate. Just compare the film to the wiki article and you'll see what I mean. Farkeld (talk) 05:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Hannibal 2006film.jpg[edit]

Image:Hannibal 2006film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hannibal: The Fall of Carthage listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hannibal: The Fall of Carthage. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:29, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]