Talk:Hanamkonda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A problem of definition and focus[edit]

I have opened a discussion at the India Project Noticeboard relating to the focus of this and related articles. - Sitush (talk) 07:57, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitush:All are different. Warangal was city, Kazipet and Hanamkonda are nearby areas. These were merged in Warangal. As of now, Warangal became Greater Warangal with the merger and no separate towns of Kazipet and Hanamkonda exist.--Vin09(talk) 14:47, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's a long time ago! I can't remember the outcome of the discussion. - Sitush (talk) 14:49, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 June 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move with support. Note that the redirect has non-trivial history, but parallel history with this article, so this doesn't appear to be a good candidate for histmerge. Will do a simple page swap. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 23:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


HanamakondaHanamkonda – No disambiguation needed Vin09(talk) 14:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, but not for the nominator's rationale (which I don't understand). Hanamkonda (without the third a) is the spelling used in the article's sources. —  AjaxSmack  02:23, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.