Talk:HMS Triton (1796)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 01:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No DABs, external links OK
File:Sir John Gore.jpeg needs a British license
All other images properly licensed
Hyphen for fifth rate
Policy is not to cite data in the infobox if it's covered in the main body.
Drop trailing zeros in conversions
- What you did is fine, but you can control your trailing digits by adding, forex |0, to the template to round to the nearest whole number, or |1 to the nearest tenth, etc.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fix the link to weatherly ship so that it actually links to the term
with Triton involving herself more in close blockade work than in earlier years Rephrase, she had about a year's service by this point!
More later.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:26, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tell the reader what type of ship each British ship is on first mention. Generalities suffice as the reader can look them up to see each one's rating if curious.
Suggest add a period at the end of the title in the bibliography to help separate it from the publisher's location.
Nicely done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks very much for doing this! I believe I have made all the corrections you listed here, but would appreciate it if you could check the File:Sir John Gore.jpeg, I am still not too sure I've done that correctly. Thanks again, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 00:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- One small correction to the image licensing that you added, but it should be good to go now. You did a nice job here; I hope you do more of these type of articles. Just remember to avoid the sorts of things that needed to be corrected here.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]