Talk:HMS Loyalty (J217)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMS Loyalty (J217). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Rattler[edit]

Sources added for the renaming as Loyalty being in June 1943, which has been in the article from the beginning, presumably sourced from Colledge & Warlow 2006 (I do not have this, but have cited Colledge's earlier edition - perhaps a colleague could update if later edition has changed). The newspaper reports are confirmatory: in April 1943 Rattler's commanding officer wrote to the town council to introduce himself and the crew, as well as putting the exchange of plaques in train. In Late June the council were "shocked" to be informed that the name had been changed, after they had already had their plaque made (and the late change was also mentioned when the plaques were finally exchanged in July 1944 - just in time!). Completion as Rattler is also confirmed by Moss & Hume (and maybe by McCluskie).

However, this source claims that not only did the ship enter service as Loyalty, but that she was renamed even before launching. Puzzling, but seems unlikely. Davidships (talk) 12:15, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have found numerous errors in naval-history.net's WW2 ship histories over the years. I no longer regard it as factually reliable if contradicted by other sources.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the cautionary word - this isn't my principal maritime field, and it is one of those sources that looks authoritative. Davidships (talk) 19:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]