Talk:Grunge/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 ← Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grunge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

08:53, 16 June 2017 (UTC) Inclusion of a neglected band: Days of the new (Charlestown, Indiana) ==

Hi all. I propose to include an important grunge (or post-grunge?) band from Charlestown, Indiana, called Days of the new. This band is frequently neglected in most discussions and accounts on grunge bands, but I think at least it deserves to be listed in the 'Notable bands' list in 'Elsewhere in United States'. I would also like to know others opinions on this topic and the reasons why this band has been excluded. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.117.4.15 (talk) 18:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

I oppose. While they were incredibly talented, they had only three records and kinda faded out of mainstream attention rather quickly. Nirvana, on the other hand, may have had three records, but one went Diamond in the US and they have an immense cultural impact in comparison. They don't have really a lot of notability in comparison to the others, and critics can't really make a majority agreement if they're even real grunge. Hopefully you can understand. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 11:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
It seems like you'd be hard pressed to argue they were influential in the genre if they didn't even release their first album until 1997. The genre was declining big time by 1995. Also what you say is true about how they are "frequently neglected in these discussions" of the genre, Wikipedia is not the place to change things like that. Sergecross73 msg me 15:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Genre in a" major" decline since when?says who you???Are your a reliable source?Wikiscribe (talk) 08:53, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 June 2017

The band Soundgarden has been added twice to the list of bands from the Seattle area, first as Soundgarden, then as Sound Garden. Remove the "Sound Garden" one. Is the fourth or so on the list, because the person responsible for its addition ignored alphabetical order too. 5.225.212.61 (talk) 22:50, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done Removed Sound Garden. Both link to Soundgarden. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 23:23, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Grunge fashion move discussion

FYI, there is a proposal for a page move: 1990s Grunge Fashion → Grunge fashion

The target is currently a redirect to this article.

Editors are invited to join the discussion at Talk:1990s Grunge Fashion#Requested move 29 June 2017.

Thanks – Reidgreg (talk) 13:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grunge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grunge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Bush

A user keeps removing the sales success of the band Bush. He doesn't give any reason to remove it. The whole Bush was criticized thing isn't a reason and the whole "grunge died when Bush emerged" thing is original research. Besides, Alice in Chains, Soundgarden, etc were popular when Bush was popular. Then he says only the first two Bush albums are sourced but the first two Bush albums are the only Bush albums mentioned in the article. Bush being grunge is sourced. Bush's sales success do have to do with the popularity of grunge. Statik N (talk) 03:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Grunge/Archive_5&oldid=861662004"