Talk:Grindstone (time-tracking software)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Reasoning behind notability tag?[edit]
I'm not affiliated nor receive compensation from Grindstone but a newsletter from them did bring this to my attention. I'm a software developer and I don't understand how software that has been given 5 starts by CNET and has been reviewed by PC World has its notability questioned. A single Google search of "Grindestone time tracking" returns 78000 results including said review as well as blog entries such as the one below:
http://teck.in/time-tracking-using-grindstone.html
--Books fan (talk) 23:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Reviews section - tag[edit]
The Reviews section has the tag "This section contains content that is written like an advertisement." I don't think it appears written like an advertisement because it contains both positive and negative aspects of the software. If it were truly an advertisement, the negative aspects would be eliminated. Just a thought. Maybe the tag should be removed? What do other people think? --Allison Jean Paully (talk) 16:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)