Talk:Green (R.E.M. album)/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Removing reviews

Please do not remove professional reviews that are deemed acceptable by WikiProject Album standards. --Fantailfan 22:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

who says...?

that world leader pretend is about the state of US politics or forgien policy? i've seen a lot of pages claiming to have knowledge of the author's mind and the lyrics' meaning but unless stipe is the one editing this page (or other authors editing other pages) people should refrain from interpreting song lyrics on an encyclopedic entry. 71.59.195.91 10:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

This has been fixed. Sbacle 20:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Trivia

The trivia section has been integrated into the main body of the article. Two bullet points were left out.

  • Although the title of the album is "Green", the cover artwork is orange in color. The reason for this is that, if one stares at the orange image for several seconds and then closes his eyes, the negative image he will then see on his eyelids is green. When viewed negatively in this manner, the cover art appears to depict green grass.

The first seams to be original research. In any case one would need to cite a member of the band specifically stating that this is why the album was orange (and on the contrary I seem to remember an interview circa Monster in which Michael states that he just happens to like the color and that's why it shows up on so many album covers.) The second bullet point is mildly interesting but has almost nothing to do with the album. The comment already appears in the article for the album R.E.M. by Green where it is more appropriate. Sbacle 20:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop the revert wars!

Hey! Between the two of you, you have edited over 10,000 pages; I have edited over 3500. As a disinterested observer, I am citing the unofficial "way too much time on our hands" doctrine: Let's compromise!
a) Dudesleeper is correct on the dating. The reason for this is very simple: for many years now release dates have standardized on Tuesdays in America and Mondays in other places. The difference of a single day is not worth this craziness.

  • Proposed: We can use (as as has been the case elsewhere) one date with the UK release date and the second with the US one. You can even use cute little flag icons for them. (b) There are no explicit guidelines on how to incorporate an album article in a discography.
  • Proposed: We add a second discography using this format, with the albums discography taking top spot, the chronological one the second:
| Misc         = {{Extra chronology 2
  | Artist     = 
  | Type       = 
  | Last album = 
  | This album = 
  | Next album = 
  }}

Discuss, please. --Fantailfan (talk) 20:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Title Origin

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I saw somewhere that R.E.M. named this album "Green" as a stab against those who claimed that the band had sold out. "Green" is of course a reference to money, and the $10 million dollars the band would receive for their first album with Warner Brothers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MGrassi (talkcontribs) 13:46, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

I thought it was a reference to then emerging Green movement. Either way, needs a source.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 22:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Just found a quote from Peter Buck here in which he says, "It's just a title. We could have called it 'Fred'." So there you go.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 22:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
My two cents I recall Stipe saying that it was a triple entendre between environmentalism, being young or fresh (the album being their first on a major label as well as a new start for the band), and cash (in reference to their massive contract.) I don't have a citation, but I'm going to guess it's in Talk About the Passion, the oral history of the band. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 22:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 19:00, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Green (R.E.M. album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Article requirements:

Green tickY All the start class criteria
Green tickY A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
Green tickY At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section)
Green tickY A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Green tickY A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
Green tickY Categorisation at least by artist and year
Green tickY A casual reader should learn something about the album. Andrzejbanas (talk) 07:28, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

To meet the more rigorous criteria of the revised B class, this article needs improved sourcing to help readers verify the accuracy of information. It also needs information on technical personnel. Additional improvements may also be necessary. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on B class in album articles. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:53, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 09:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 14:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)