Talk:Greater flameback

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

According to http://www.birdtours.co.uk/tripreports/sri-lanka/sri10/feb-03.htm (ref: Red-Backed Greater Flameback (stricklandi)) and http://wingsbirds.com/tours/srilanka.htm (ref: the recently split Crimson-backed Flameback,), the Sri Lankan species is a seperate species. Does it deserve a new page or should there just be an edit for the last paragraph --Preveen 13:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess if there is sufficient information about it, a new page should be started. If most of the information is identical. Then a mention of the species should be added with a page added for the new species redirecting here. A photograph would be a great addition. Shyamal 13:13, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greater flameback. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]