Talk:Gorilla/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 (talk · contribs) 18:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The prose needs tightening in a lot of areas, the article content is nowhere near complete, a lot of text is uncited, and the nominator The great Jay has never edited the page. This is a clear fail. Jay, I encourage you to work on the article before re-nominating. You can use Orangutan as a guide for writing ape articles User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 18:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed