Talk:Gone for Goode/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Link rot: no dead links found

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
A scene involving a funeral accidentally exhuming the wrong body while investigating the Church case mirrored a similar situation described in Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets from the Parrish case "a funeral accidentally exhuming the wrong body"? Do we mean an undertaker or a funeral director here? Done

I made a number of minor copy-edits for clarity.[1]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
The article is adequately referenced to reliable sources. I assume good faith for all off-line sources.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Thorough, but not over detailed.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Two images used, bot correctly tagged and captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

If you can just fix the exhumation bit above, I will be happy to pass this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good, all is in order, I am happy to list this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that should have read "funeral director", not funeral. I've fixed it. Thanks for the review! — Hun ter Ka hn 20:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]