Talk:Gnar Tapes
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This page should not be speedy deleted because...[edit]
This page should not be speedily deleted because... Hi! I am requesting that the Gnar Tapes remain in the encyclopedia. I plan on expanding it in the next couple of days when I have time. Also, I don't see why a page like Marriage Records can exist, but the similarly formatted Gnar Tapes page is scheduled for deletion. Let me know anything I can do other than expanding it, I would really like to keep this page alive. Thank you! --Davidradosevic (talk) 20:52, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- The problem here isn't the formatting of the page, it's the lack of sufficient references to show that the page is notable. Has Gnar Tapes been mentioned in multiple reliable and independent sources? §everal⇒|Times 20:35, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
- I made this post before I edited Gnar Tapes again and added a couple of sources. I could probably add one or two more. Are the current ones not sufficient enough to sustain notability? Davidradosevic (talk) 22:40, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
- The more the better, usually. Published sources are best - see WP:SOURCES for more about what's considered a reliable source. I know that a DIY-oriented label is most likely to be mentioned in blogs. Marriage Records has the same problem. Blogs unfortunately are rarely considered reliable sources, with one sole caveat: if the blogger is an "expert on the topic of the article, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." §everal⇒|Times 00:14, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- I made this post before I edited Gnar Tapes again and added a couple of sources. I could probably add one or two more. Are the current ones not sufficient enough to sustain notability? Davidradosevic (talk) 22:40, 29 November 2012 (UTC)