This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
I'd like to change the gloria myths section title, not for lack of creativity, awesome title heading, just not very encyclopedic sounding.--Briaboru (talk) 14:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm the person who expanded the stub and added that detail (it's a pet peeve of mine that so often music isn't fully and accurately credited, especially in the digital age), as well as the section head. Thanks for the courtesy of announcing your intention here, and for the compliment! I find subheads the least inspired writing on the planet, and on occasion perhaps my sense of humor gets the best of me in the interest of creating a hook without rendering the subsequent fleshing-out redundant. But you're right, beyond a certain point (as here) it's more appropriate for an article in a magazine than for one in an encyclopedia, and I don't object to a change. Thanks again for the heads-up! Abrazame (talk) 23:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]