Talk:Getting It (film)
 | This orphaned talk page, subpage, image page, or similar is not eligible for speedy deletion under CSD G8 as it has been asserted to be useful to Wikipedia. If you believe it should be deleted, please nominate it on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. |
Notability of the film[edit]
Weird. I'm not challenging the PROD nom or anything; I'm not removing it yet. I wonder how effective the AFC process is. If the porn film's notability is not well verified, why did the draft pass the AFC process? Pinging K.e.coffman and Kvng about this. --George Ho (talk) 04:31, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- I don't see a pass of GNG with 'reviews' being cited to various commercial web sites that sell the videos. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:32, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- @K.e.coffman: Are the sources reliable to verify the notability of this film? --George Ho (talk) 20:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Not the way I see it. The sources are mostly commercial web sites: they are not independent of the subject (their goal being to sell more videos) and have no editorial oversight. Does this make sense? K.e.coffman (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- I get what you're saying, K.e.coffman
, so I requested speedy deletion as the sole author who substantiated the content (G7 criterion).--George Ho (talk) 00:11, 3 March 2017 (UTC) - Never mind; the person said it doesn't qualify for speedy deletion. George Ho (talk) 04:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- I get what you're saying, K.e.coffman
- Not the way I see it. The sources are mostly commercial web sites: they are not independent of the subject (their goal being to sell more videos) and have no editorial oversight. Does this make sense? K.e.coffman (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- @K.e.coffman: Are the sources reliable to verify the notability of this film? --George Ho (talk) 20:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)