Talk:Gertrude Hull

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleGertrude Hull was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 11, 2021Good article nomineeListed
February 26, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 8, 2017.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that high school teacher Gertrude Hull tutored Douglas MacArthur in preparation for passing his entrance examination to West Point?
Current status: Delisted good article


Not notable?[edit]

Is this person deserving of a Wikipedia page? I think not.Mukogodo (talk) 06:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gertrude Hull/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Aussie Article Writer (talk · contribs) 13:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Passes "good article" nomination[edit]

This article has now passed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 12, 2021, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass Pass
2. Verifiable?: Pass Pass
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass Pass
I would like to see more information on how she was influenced by Alice Freeman Palmer. What in particular was it that she admired? How did it affect the way she lived her life?
  •  Done I have looked everywhere imaginable and have not been able to find anything further on how Gertrude Hull was influenced by Alice Freeman Palmer. The only thing I could find is where the reference #5 of Bentley Historical library says she was influenced by Palmer.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
She was part of many different organizations. In what capacity? And did she accomplish anything by them? I have often found people who are part of this many organizations were more influential that just one event. For instance, originally I thought that Kate Baker was only important because of her encouragement and championing of Joseph Furphy, but a bit of digging found that she was far more influential in the Australian literary world of the time than I could have imagined.
  •  Done Have not found anything further if Hull accomplished anything further in the organizations she was associated with.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • That's fair. Pass Pass
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass Pass
5. Stable?: Pass Pass
6. Images?: Pass Pass

This article seems a little short. It would also be good if you could add {{sfn}} to the references section so it links to the works in the Sources section.

  •  Done Fixed year in sources so sfn template links correctly to Source book

Nonetheless, I can see from the variety of sources that you have done some great research already. I'm sure if you do a bit more digging you could flesh out the article more.

  •  Done Don't see where I can expand the article further. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Aussie Article Writer (talk) 13:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment[edit]

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]