Talk:Germanic–Roman contacts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk:Contacts between German tribes and the Roman Empire.

Better title: Germano-roman contacts/relations..?

Note that this article is an edited part of a paper written by Norwegian Archaeologist Are Skarstein Kolberg as part of his BA in archaeology at the University of Oslo in 2007. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.66.196.102 (talk) 22:10, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on the article appreciated.

Should this article really exist?[edit]

The concept of Germanic peoples is quite difficult to separate from the topic of interactions with the Roman empire. What does this article handle better than Germanic peoples or various related articles?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 15:32, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

brit wiki and its danophillia, what a joke[edit]

This is such a terrible article. Like 80 percent of it focusses on "denmark" (even tho the cultural ancestors of the danes did not live in jutland at the time) of all things. Which is strange considering most of the contact between roman people and germanic peoples happened in what is now modern day germany. In comparison there was very little contact and exchange between rome and scandinvia. There is so much exchange and conflict with actual sources happening in central europe. This article seems to leave out pretty much all of this though and reads as if it was written by some danophile fanfictionist. Pretty much everything in it is unsourced as well. Might as well stop publishing historical topics in the english wiki alltogether if something so misinforming is the outcome of it. 178.24.247.250 (talk) 17:17, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article title[edit]

I find it funny that this article's title contains 'contacts' and the article on contacts with the Chinese is called Sino-Roman relations. Shouldn't it be just the opposite? --TadejM my talk 23:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]