Talk:Georgina Adam

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 4 October 2018 by reviewer Ritchie333 (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Cleanup[edit]

Paging Megalibrarygirl for cleanup. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:40, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ritchie333, can you kindly mail me the FT piece? I am highly unconvinced about her deserve-ability of an article and am thinking of an Afd as a very-realistic prospect. ∯WBG^converse 16:11, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can't access it at the moment. I don't want to break confidence, but Megalibrarygirl has not been able to commit much time to Wikipedia recently for personal reasons; please give her a chance to review the article first. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ritchie333, fine enough:-) ∯WBG^converse 16:37, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also we could probably redirect somewhere like The Art Newspaper if there aren't enough sources forthcoming. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:48, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On a note, I dislike this trend of creating/promoting random articles, per a variant of ILIKEIT and then, scampering for sources.

As SeraphimBlade was saying the other day:--Find the sources first. If you can't, refrain from writing the article.

If you can't justify the sourcing of an article, (with immediacy), please leave it for MLG or whoever has experience in the field to do the promotion.

P.S--It's more of a general reflection than on this specific issue. ∯WBG^converse 18:45, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]