Talk:Georgia Cryptologic Center

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Georgia Cryptologic Center article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Georgia Cryptologic Center appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 January 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Georgia Cryptologic Center is an NSA facility that uses the code name "Sweet Tea"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Georgia Cryptologic Center.

Wikipedia

Mass surveillance Low‑importance

	Georgia Cryptologic Center is within the scope of WikiProject Mass surveillance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of mass surveillance and mass surveillance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.Mass surveillanceWikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillanceTemplate:WikiProject Mass surveillanceMass surveillance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Intelligence / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Georgia (U.S. state) Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Crooked Creek (Georgia), Ed Defore Sports Complex, Audery Mill Creek, More (Georgia)... More (U.S.)...
Assess : Rate articles from Unassessed Georgia (U.S. state) articles and Unknown-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category.
Geographical coordinates : more Georgia (U.S. state) articles missing geocoordinate data
Infobox : Georgia (U.S. state) articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Georgia (U.S. state)
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Georgia (U.S. state)
Stubs : Work on stubs in articles in Georgia (U.S. state) stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) radio station stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) road stubs and Georgia (U.S. state) geography stubs.
Other : *Deletion sorting: Please see the collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state) - compiled by WikiProject Deletion sorting
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Georgia (U.S. state) articles needing attention
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
- Tag the talk pages of Georgia (U.S. state)-related articles with the {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}} banner.
- Get Georgia (U.S. state) to a featured article quality standard

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 23:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Georgia Cryptologic Center is an NSA facility that uses the code name "Sweet Tea"? Source: https://www.wired.com/2012/03/ff-nsadatacenter/ Quote: "NSA Georgia, Fort Gordon, Augusta, Georgia...Codenamed Sweet Tea, the facility has been massively expanded..."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Edith Rosenwald Stern
- Comment: Eagwig matches a quote in the article taken from an NSA website, but it's in quotations to make clear where it's coming from, and per Copyright status of works by the federal government of the United States is PD text as is the description that matches in the "Role" parameter of the infobox.
  - Added {{USGovernment}} to the reference. BorgQueen (talk) 13:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    - @BorgQueen: Thank you, I didn't know about that template, I'll make a note of that for future use. - Aoidh (talk) 13:04, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Aoidh (talk). Self-nominated at 11:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

New enough, long enough (just barely), neutral and sourced. No copyvios. Hook is interesting and cited. QPQ done. This looks good to go! BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:03, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]