Talk:Geany

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Early comments[edit]

I certainly think this article should NOT be deleted - a the links at the bottom of the page or just a Google search for genie review provides several reviews of the program. Further, since it's a software program which is automatically installable with Ubuntu Linux, I'd say that also warrants its inclusion. I recommend the {{notability}} tag be removed. --AndyKali (talk) 01:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually that is not the policy. There needs to be a significant coverage by reliable independent sources of the subject of the article. If you can show those, the article can be kept. W Nowicki (talk) 19:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does anybody know, what does the name stand for or what did it come from? Although I'm not sure if it is important enough to be included in the article itself, at least here it would be nice to find that information -UserHuge (talk) 00:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the logo suggests it's Genie from the bottle.Errarel (talk) 23:32, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geany. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100216182754/http://geany.darwinports.com:80/ to http://geany.darwinports.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can an Wikipedia article be used as citation source ?[edit]

Dear all,

other articles in Wikipedia provide the citation demanded in the article Geany.

Can they be used as a reference source, to provided the citation needed ?

All the best,
--Hgfernan (talk) 04:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hgfernan: - I answered on your Talk page. Paulscrawl (talk) 15:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]