Talk:Gareth Morgan (economist)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New Zealand: Politics Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Dudding, Adam (27 January 2013). "Why does Gareth Morgan think he's the cat's pyjamas?". Sunday Star-Times. Retrieved 16 May 2019. Last week, the first line of Morgan's Wikipedia page was briefly replaced with an unprintable bit of advice.

Climate change[edit]

It enlisted the assistance of international eminent scientists on both sides of the debate in a project to determine the weight of evidence around the hypothesis that human-induced climate change is present

"eminent scientists on both sides of the debate"? Are there any on the denialist side? Would be news to me. --Hob Gadling (talk) 15:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted that sentence as it did not have a reliable source. Schwede 66 10:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]