Talk:Fuzzy classification
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
While obvious effort has gone into the text, this article is somewhat of a mess including that passages are repeated. I am suspicious that words like consequentially (instead of consequently) indicate that this article is not designed for the easy reading of those who would like to become familiar with these ideas.
It would be very helpful to have a common English-language overview of what fuzzy classification is before we get into the esoteric formal symbols. That is, the plain language overview descriptions may (1) be sufficient for the needs of certain readers and (2) help us to understand the meaning of the formal symbols.