Talk:FutureSex/LoveSounds/GA1

GA Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   The lead sorta summarizes the article, but not entirely and it would be best to expand it a little more.

I think its complete?Any more topic to touch on the lead? --Efe (talk) 10:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Yup, it summarizes the article. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

1. B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   In the Background section, a source is needed for the Justified hits.

I change the first sentence to "Timberlake released his debut album, Justified, in 2002, and spawned the US top five hit "Rock Your Body"." I thin it does not need source. Its factual and is not contentious. Senorita was not a hit, sorry, so I removed it.

Yeah, I was having a hard time with "Señorita" being a major hit, but its fine now. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

A source is needed for both these sentences ---> "Since Justified, Timberlake wanted to be recognized as an R&B artist because it is the kind of music he grew listening to" and "When his debut album was released, reviews were positive about it, however, most of them were under the pop album category", in the Music and lyrics section.

The source of these lines are supported by the citation of this line: "Timberlake reflects, "OK, well I'm not an R&B artist, I'm a pop artist, so I'm just going to go wherever I want to go."[9]" --Efe (talk) 10:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, thanks for catching me on that, I was wondering if not that was the source to them. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

A source is needed for the release date of the album.

Sourced. --Efe (talk) 10:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Cool. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Is there a source for the Beyoncé and 50 Cent collaborating in the deluxe version of the album?

The tracklisting itself is the source. --Efe (talk) 10:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Awesome. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

It would be best to add the DVD as source to the last paragraph from the Release and reception section.

Which exactly? --Efe (talk) 10:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

See Triple H#cite note-KOK-53 as an example. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is also part of the DVD ---> "Guests were American artists Three 6 Mafia, T.I., Snoop Dogg, and the album's producers will.i.am and Timbaland", it would be best to add it as a source. If not, a source is needed for that.

1. C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

2. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

3. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

4. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

5. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

6. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:17, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, after reading the article, I have gone off and passed the article. Congratulations. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC)