This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Requested articles, because it is used for the administration of the Requested articles process or it was formerly listed at Requested articles.Requested articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Requested articlesTemplate:WikiProject Requested articlesRequested articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 08:12, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
– The book and the play are notable but they are not the first thing that comes to mind when looking for "funeral games". It appears this article was split from the dab page a few months ago because the dab page had grown beyond disambiguating, but I think the classical meaning is the primary topic and the dab page should be at Funeral games (disambiguation). Green Giant (talk) 04:19, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but make sure we have hatnotes to help anybody who gets lost. I'd agree that the original meaning looks like the primary topic in this case. bobrayner (talk) 09:13, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Seems like a good example of not using a cumbersome phrase of unnecessary disambiguation for a topic of long-term significance. Cynwolfe (talk) 11:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Agreed with all of the above. P Aculeius (talk) 13:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.