Talk:Frederick Parker-Rhodes

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Fungi Low‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Quakers Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers).

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Theoretical books need summaries[edit]

The references to Parker-Rhodes's linguistics, mathematics and physics works should be fleshed out in the main article. The article makes it clear that he was published in a remarkable range of subject areas, but it conveys no notion of what the work actually was about. In formal fields, outside biology, he was an "architectonic" philosopher-scientist (like Leibniz or Charles Peirce), not hesitating to build novel conceptual edifices as required. He often introduced new terminology and idiosyncratic notation, as an independent (but sound) scientific thinker, which makes his most technical works hard to read. I'm adding brief descriptions of two of the cited books.

I don't see a connection of Parker-Rhodes' proposed "combinatorial hierarchy", further developed by physicists, with his The Theory of Indistinguishable or The Inevitable Universe. (As a physics theory, it's been amusingly attacked as "mere numerology.")99.118.152.133 (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]