Talk:Frans Krafft

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 7 January 2016 by reviewer Hegvald (talk · contribs).

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Composers

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles

Accepted draft[edit]

This article was previously declined as a draft based on no argued reason. However, a Frans Joseph Krafft who died on 13 January 1795 is covered by Grove Music Online and can thus be regarded as notable enough for a Wikipedia article. I accepted the draft on this basis.

The issue with this article is that it expands Krafft's biography beyond what is covered by Grove and, in particular, that it revises previous assumptions about the year of his birth. This is apparently based on research that has been published in a Dutch-language print publication that should be brought in to support this article. As it is not a BLP and the notability is clear, neither seems like good reasons to decline this. --Hegvald (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]