Talk:For all tid

Untitled

Isn't it probable that Aldragh - Guest Vocals, is actually Aldrahn of Dodheimsgard, since they all know each other and I don't know of any Aldragh. Death2 12:41, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Could very well be the same person. I found that info on Dimmu's official site. If you can find out who it is, props to you. However, I don't think he's famous enough for it to even matter that much. marnues 17:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

In fact here's what I have.

Guest vocals by:

Vicotnik from Dødheimsgård/Ved Buens Ende.

Vocals on "Over Bleknede Blåner Til Dommedag " by Aldragh

I don't know Dødheimsgård so maybe its before he was with them? Otherwise I suspect they would have labeled him like they did for Vicotnik. marnues 17:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, I found myself looking over the bio section to find a date for Tjodalv's departure and found:

The album features contributions by Aldrahn from Dødheimsgard and Vicotnik from Ved Buens Ende.

So, you are correct. I don't have the actual album to know whether it was a typo or not though. marnues 17:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

And also Aldrahn worked with Galder before so I presumed it's the same circle of people and the name is quite similiar. Whether he is important or not it's not my decision to make. But Dodheimsgard is a familiar band and it has it's own page on wikipedia so... Death2 22:05, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Since it is him, I would agree that he is famous enough. marnues 22:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

hi

what it mean "for all tid" ?

In English it translates as "For All Time" marnues 21:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC) Are you sure? is not for always, of forever? Mallerd 12:47, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:For all tid.jpg

Image:For all tid.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dimmuforalltid.jpg

Image:Dimmuforalltid.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no move. Current title is correct according to Wikipedia naming conventions. JPG-GR (talk) 00:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

For All Tid → For all tid — Proper capitalization, as per the standards given here. — = ∫_t^c 5th Eye 02:40, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion

Any additional comments:

• Comment The naming conventions say to use the capitalization used by that language (in this case, Norwegian). I don't claim to speak Norwegian, but the article in the Norwegian Wikipedia shares the current capitalization: [1] JPG-GR (talk) 01:27, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  • That may be so, but the Norwegian capitalization standard according to MusicBrainz (which is usually considered a very accurate site) states otherwise. = ∫_t^c 5th Eye 05:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move, September 2009

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved. Since this conclusion is different from that of the last move request, I'll comment. There seems to be a consensus on the albums project to standardize capitalization by language. This is different in kind from the branding issues that motivated MOSCAPS, for example. There's no show of lack of consensus below, either. GTBacchus^(talk) 02:42, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

---

For All Tid → For all tid — Proper capitalization as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums#Capitalization — = ∫_t^c 5th Eye 16:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

• As this has been moved back and forth a few times, I think a discussion is needed. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

• Support moving to standard Norwegian capitalization, as the wikiproject guideline suggests. Jafeluv (talk) 16:44, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
• Comment — per WP:ALBUMCAPS, it states the first word and last word in the title will be capitalized, so therefore, the proper move should be For All Tid → For all Tid. 『 ɠu¹ɖяy 』 ^¤ • ¢ 23:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
  • That only applies to titles in English. It's the standard for all titles, not just music, in English, but it is NOT the standard for other languages. = ∫_t^c 5th Eye 05:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Also, if you're going to argue for the application of WP:ALBUMCAPS here, it definitely does not support For all Tid (since "all" is neither a coordinating conjunction, a preposition, an article nor the word "to"). Plus, notice that the first sentence begins with "In titles of songs, albums, and band names in the English language..." Jafeluv (talk) 10:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
• If the title is in Norwegian, it seems inappropriate to apply the rules of English to it. Support 81.110.104.91 (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.