Talk:Focalisation

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

I have deleted this article and replaced it. It is in need of attention by an expert. The article I deleted did not make sense, nor did it provide an accurate account.

Ark2120 (talk) 02:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is still not very accurate - if not to say wrong. Even though I'm not an expert but rather a student of literary criticism I'll see whether I'll have time to improve the article once my weeks of exams is over —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.130.87.106 (talk) 09:34, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Associated this tag with WP:LIT. Emass100 (talk) 02:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]