Talk:Flow conditioning

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flow conditioning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose to merge Flow straightener into Flow conditioning#Types of flow conditioners. I think that the content in the flow straightening article can easily be explained in the context of the conditioning article, and the small size of this article will fit with whatever is in the conditioning article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omegalettuce (talkcontribs) 17:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 13:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cone flowmeter section should be added[edit]

A section on cone flowmeters should be added since it has been described to function as a flow conditioner.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.95.254.191 (talk) 03:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The English in this article needs improvement[edit]

The text has frequently missing definite and indefinite articles and the chosen adjectives and adverbs are frequently awkward choices that someone whose primary language is English would be unlikely to make. There are unmistakable hints that the article has been cobbled together using a combination of academic or industrial conference research papers and industrial promotional literature. This is not in itself a flaw, but in places the article would benefit from additional rephrasing to harmonize the content. This will require someone with expertise in fluid mechanics which is not one in which I have sufficient expertise to attempt the required editing. PolychromePlatypus (talk) 12:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]