Talk:Firefly Arts Collective

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Media source[edit]

Have there been any news stories on Firefly? It would be nice to include some secondary sources. If not, I have to ask: is the event notable enough to include in an encyclopedia? VxP 21:47, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but I've posted a message on Tribe to see. Even if there is no mainstream media coverage don't similar articles set a precedent? Here are some examples, most of which had far fewer attendees:
  1. Recompression - 180 Attendees - 0 listed news stories
  2. EmoTAZ - 47 Attendees - 0 Listed news stories
  3. NoWhere (event) - 140 Attendees - 0 Listed news stories
  4. Playa del Fuego - 850 Attendees - 0 Listed news stories
Further, prior to this article's creation List of regional Burning Man events red linked to this page and Burning Man linked to Firefly's website.
Like Burning Man there is a certain extent the Fireflies would like to limit media exposure. At the same time Burner events are meant to be participant-exclusive, media is thus often unwelcome. ForestJay 05:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, 1) this article is actually one of the best from the List of regional Burning Man events; 2) Being "in the news" just means that the mainstream establishment has recognized the event - Wikipedia, being (in a sense) Anarchy in Action doesn't need or necessarily want to follow the establishment. Just my $0.02(US) :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 21:14, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page move?[edit]

The title of this page is actually the name of the organizing non-profit group, while the event is just called "Firefly". I suggest this article be renamed Firefly (event) - any objections? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 18:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've actually had the same thought. There had once been a red link to Firefly (Event). ForestJay 01:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think I had put that on List of regional Burning Man events at one point. Not sure. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 04:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

This was posted to a related group today:

"2003 (165 tickets)
2004 was Friday, June 17th through Monday, June 20th. (240 tickets, 4 days)
2005 was Friday the 1st through Monday the 4th. ($25, 400 tickets, 4 days, first year sold out)
2006 was Friday the 30th though Monday the 3rd. ($30, 480 tickets, 4 days)
2007 was Thursday the 5th through Sunday the 8th. ($35, 400 tickets, 4 days)
2008 was Thursday the 3rd through Sunday the 6th. ($40, 500 tickets, 4 days, single-year site with pond)
2009 was Thursday the 2nd through Sunday the 5th. ($40, 450 tickets, 4 days, first year at current site)
2010 was Thursday the 1st through Monday the 5th. ($45, 600 tickets, 5 days)
2011 was Thursday the 30th through Monday the 4th. ($50, 600 tickets, 5 days)
2012 was Wednesday the 4th through Sunday the 8th. ($75, 789 tickets, 5 days, first year of ticket lottery+waitlist returns)
2013 was Wednesday the 3rd through Sunday the 7th. ($75, 849 tickets, 5 days)
2014 was Tuesday the 1st through Sunday the 6th. ($85, $20 parking, 850 tickets, 6 days, new ticketing software, ARTifacts, buses)
2015 was Tuesday the 30th through Sunday the 5th. ($80, $30 parking, 950 tickets, 6 days)
2016 was Wednesday the 29th through Monday the 4th. ($80, $30 parking, 1050 tickets, 6 days, ARTifacts are now Intentions)"
Darxus (talk) 20:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]