Talk:Fenelon Place Elevator

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Iowa

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Iowa portal This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Coordinates[edit]

Anyone care to add the lat/long coordinates? Google maps doesn't have high res sat images of Dubuque and I've never been there to guess by way of the street map. I can deal with putting the template on the page if someone who knows can give me the location. :) Cburnett 14:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.dbq.com/fenplco/history.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It only has one door?[edit]

The article contains the following text:

It only has one door, the entrance at the small shack at the bottom of the hill.

I don't begin to understand this. It seems to imply that the elevator is a tourist ride only, with no way of getting on or off at the top. Can anybody confirm this?. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 19:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've located the top station on Google Streetview, and it quite clear from the signage there that you can get on and off there. I will remove the offending sentence, as it is uncited and clearly incorrect. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 19:04, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can confirm. I grew up in Dubuque and have ridden this elevator many times. You can board at either the top or the bottom. There is no ticketing at the bottom (4th Street), so if you board below you pay for your ride once you reach the top. Boarding can also be done from the top. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:601:9580:19DC:E9C0:9B9:ADC7:89D2 (talk) 04:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Claim to be the world's steepest railroad[edit]

Although it is not stated in the Wikipedia article, on the Fenelon Place Elevator's own website (and several other places) it is claimed that it is "the world's shortest and steepest railroad". (At one place on the website it rather cannily states that "it has been called the ..." but the heading on the homepage makes the claim unambiguously. The website calls the elevator a funicular railway, so it would be appropriate for it to be judged for this claim against other railways including funiculars.

It seems clear that this claim is incorrect regarding the gradient. For example, both the Stoosbahn and the Katoomba Scenic World Railway are steeper (the latter may not be a true funicular but rather an inclined railway, which would still allow it to invalidate Fenelon Place's claim).

Would it be appropriate to add a line to the article to reference this incorrect claim? Is it enough to source authoritative sources about the gradients of each, or would we need a source that actually disputes the Fenelon Place website's claim, in order to avoid a strike for Wikipedia:No original research ? JA 1961 (talk) 21:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would remove the claim completely in this article but wait till you can get a more definitive source or list. You could replace the claim as steepest in the world with empirical measurements if they are available. ✶Qux yz ✶ 19:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]