Talk:ExitMundi.nl

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ExitMundi.nl article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on April 15, 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This article is poorly written and relies on a preponderance of verbatim text from the subject website, but I still feel (edited) it could be an important, worthwhile entry. ka1iban 15:34, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prod (copied here from User:Orangemike's talk page)[edit]

I saw you proded the article. Do you think it does not meet WP:WEB. Three references are present which describe the subject in quite detail. Otolemur crassicaudatus

The three references include a one-paragraph mention in a six-year-old online column about end-of-the-world websites; a brief description in a reporter's blog/column about quirky websites; and a link I can't get to open. These do not constitute significant coverage. "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:23, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the refs don't establish notability, which is why I had tagged it for improved references. Per a disucssion on my/OC's talk page, he doesn't believe it needs more refs or that stubs need refs so I let it go. Without more, improved sources to determine notability, I agree with Orange Mike. FWIW, RS covergae appears very limited. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 20:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(ec to Orangemike) Thanks for explaining the "significant coverage" that "sources address the subject directly in detail". My understanding of WP:WEB probably then inaccurate since I missed this fact. I only saw this article while patrolling the website category and found it interesting. But now I am agree with Orangemike. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 20:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Making a comment here at the request of Otolemur since I deproded the article. I deproded while PROD patrolling because the article had previously been proded and disputed. As for the issue of notability, I don't believe the article in itself currently establishes notability. It does, however, give indications of possible notability. I agree with ka1iban above that the article could possibly be rescued through a rewrite and addition of sources. Redfarmer (talk) 10:41, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the case, I myself will AfD it on behalf of User:Orangemike. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that it could possible be rescued, however I think the issue at large is that the three sources included are the only ones anyone has been able to find TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 11:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alert notify malware[edit]

  Have had issues navigating to this webpage, ie; Exitmundi. After browser refused to navigate I checked at Startpage using the proxie and got an alert that malware may be present, and then the proxie didn't load. I am not able to properly diagnose the status of this site, but know in the past it was an interesting site, so am distressed to find it not available anymore. Would appreciate someone able to review the site doing so. Here is the startpage proxie link that gave me the warning;

https://ixquick-proxy.com/do/spg/proxy?ep=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&epile=4q6n41784r5441794q4459784r6p387n4q5335725n586o3q&edata=5ba93667b653979c11a7b833c40f7ecc&ek=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&ekdata=2c62ab8a016623bd66bf073e17b10d5f Thankyou, 76.113.98.56 (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ExitMundi.nl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061023214858/http://www.fcnp.com/550/online.htm to http://www.fcnp.com/550/online.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]