Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 1991/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Passed. Riley1012 (talk) 19:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Sims2aholic8 (talk · contribs) 16:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 02:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'll complete an initial review by the end of this week. -Riley1012 (talk) 02:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

For the first time since 1969 the contest resulted in a draw for first place... Add a comma after "1969"
Of the countries that participated in 1990 the Netherlands were the only country that failed to make a return... Add a comma after "1990", and the Netherlands should be treated as a singular noun, so change "were" to "was"
The nation had for a number of years attempted to make a return to the contest, however were prevented from doing so... Should be "was" instead of "were"
An audience was present for the second dress rehearsal in the evening of 3 May. Change "in" to "on"
...and during the live broadcast a number of technical mishaps occurred... Add a comma after "broadcast"
Unlike the majority of previous contest presenters, whom had conducted the events in English and French... Should be "who" instead of "whom"

2. Verifiable
Copyvio check is fine- the similarities noted are just the exact song titles and artists names. The sources used in this article are reliable. AGF on offline and non-translatable sources.

Spot check
No issues: 1, 10, 14, 16, 24, 25, 29, 32, 34, 37, 40, 55 and 56 are paywalled, 63, 66, 72

3. Broad
The article is broad and focused on the coverage of the event.

4. Neutral
The article is neutral on the coverage of the event.

5. Stable
This article is stable day-to-day.

6. Illustrated
The images in the article are free and have relevant captions.

@Sims2aholic8: Well done. Just a few minor changes are needed. -Riley1012 (talk) 15:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Riley1012: Thanks for the review! All tweaks as part of criteria 1 have now been enacted. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 19:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, thanks. -Riley1012 (talk) 19:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.