Talk:Emley

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Emley is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 6 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Emley, West Yorkshire to Emley. The result of the discussion was moved.

Recent edits by Ehrenkater[edit]

Not-with-standing the five pillars of Wikipedia that allow for editing of articles from anyone, I have to say that I'm finding the excessive edits of Ehrenkater on this page very frustrating.

I believe that they are diluting the quality of the article and removing content of interest to the people that view the page and are using it as a point of reference in regards to the history of the village.

A further frustration is that these are 'major edits' (several hundred words at a time) and as such should first be discussed here.

Could you please discuss edits here to avoid future frustration - thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThomasShackleton (talk • contribs) 19:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree completely. This article rambles and from a quick look contains many errors. J3Mrs (talk) 12:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The whole purpose of the 'open source' nature of Wikipedia is to 'correct errors'...so thank you for correcting them. These most recent edits are far more in line with expectation, rather than than the previous attempts - so thanks again...although some elements I disagree with and will add them back in when I complete my input into the article. I assume we can 'talk' about them at that time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThomasShackleton (talk • contribs) 13:54, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with J3Mrs. What you're producing here might be at home in a local guidebook, but not in an encyclopedia article. The text is rambling, contains much repetition and redundancy, and despite its length contains almost nothing on the essentials as described by WP:UKCITIES. Malleus Fatuorum 15:19, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I agree completely with the comments by J3Mrs and Malleus Fatuorum. And once it is clearer which parts of this article are actually worth retaining, clearly a lot more copy editing is going to be needed. -Ehrenkater (talk) 16:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will monitor this with interest, but do question why whole section (most recently the history of the Welsey Church) were removed, when clearly they are a part ofthe village's history? I have reinstated them. (ThomasShackleton (talk) 16:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Unfortunately little is clear in this article. You can monitor all you like but it will in the end be slimmer, focused and Emley will have a decent article. J3Mrs (talk) 17:14, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

All the references to books need page numbers. I will visit the library to see if they have the books. J3Mrs (talk) 09:19, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You cant just slap references anywhere, they must refer to what is written.J3Mrs (talk) 10:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Emley, West Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 November 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans (talk) 15:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Emley, West Yorkshire → Emley
Emley → Emley (disambiguation)

– This seems to be primary for "Emley", the village has 308 views and its football club has 814 (WP:DABCONCEPT) compared with 17 for Frank Emley and 9[[1]] for the Hundred of Elmbridge. At Talk:Emley#Untitled there was suggestion that the DAB be deleted and I removed the Surrey village as I can't fine it but because of the other 2 entries I added we can keep the DAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 07:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. YorkshireExpat (talk) 19:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.