Talk:Elkford

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This Article is written like a brochure or promotion of the area. Peacock words. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.200.137.53 (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Not sure its the highest-elevation incorporated community. Canmore's page says its at 1350 metres and incorporated 1965, Banff 1463 metres incorporated 1990. unless Elkford limits go way up the mountain 1300 metres is lower than both those places. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.67.145.71 (talk) 21:07, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I think the distinctions for highest "whatever" are usually: building, permanently occupied building, settlement, town, and city, where the distinctions are:

  1. building: a permanent man-made structure, such as an alpine hut.
  2. permanently occupied building: same as above but which is permanently occupied.
  3. settlement: unincorporated collection of permanently occupied buildings.
  4. town: The legal definition of a town in Canada varies by province or territory, as does the nomenclature, be it village, community or town, but the key distinction is the fact that it is incorporated. Basically an incorporated settlement. The incorporation provides the distinction that the settlement is of significance to legally be recognized as requiring its own administration and infrastructure.
  5. city: the definition varies by province

As such, Banff, Alberta would be considered the highest incorporated community at 1,400 metres (4,600 feet). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christopher Lamothe (talk • contribs) 18:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elkford, British Columbia → Elkford – Name is unique as town name, no secondary uses exist, target is redirect to current title. Canadian disambiguation rules per CANSTYLE say unique town/city names take no disambiguation Skookum1 (talk) 04:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support unless there is some other Elkford out there is one is obvious.--70.49.72.34 (talk) 21:55, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Clear case of WP:UNDAB. —seav (talk) 00:34, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elkford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elkford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Elkford&oldid=1201727131"