Talk:Electricity Commission of New South Wales

Australia: New South Wales Low‑importance

	Australia portal Electricity Commission of New South Wales is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Electricity Commission of New South Wales/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I think that the history of the Electricity Commission of NSW should be kept quite distinct from that of "Pacific Power"

ECNSW was a "crown corporation" and carried out many public service obligations, such as hiring more apprentices than it needed, as a way of supplying private industry with needed skills.

Also, ECNSW represented a political viewpoint that state-run commissions for the supply of utility could work. "Pacific Power" represents an alternate point of view that only private enterprise can supply efficiently. These two views of history and economic rationale, to me, seem so different that I think that the distinction is worth preserving.

Peter Woof 142.28.42.105 (talk) 18:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 14:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Electricity Commission of New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.records.nsw.gov.au/cguide/c4g/elcom.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070713145901/http://www.aph.gov.au/Library/pubs/RN/2002-03/03rn40.pdf to http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rn/2002-03/03rn40.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]