Talk:Egli model

The equation stated is nowhere mentioned in the source from Egli.

Ugh, what a mess. I hope I fixed it up correctly. Egli had mixed feet and statute miles, then assumed ideal half-wave dipoles at both transmitter and receiver. Then Seybold had copied all that without being specific about units. -- KerwoodDerby (talk) 00:04, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

_______________

This is equivalent to a propagation loss model in dB of:

30.289 + 20 Log10[ hb hm] - 40 Log10[d] - 20 Log10[f] which is easier to compare to some of the other propagation models discussed on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilkus (talk • contribs) 18:00, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]