Talk:Edutopia

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This reads like a press release - Needs significant rewrite. KConWiki 03:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KConWiki: I tried to send you and email several weeks ago to inquire about your concerns. Links from external sources have been added. Please advise what more you'd like to see. Thanks! Cinjo (talk) 23:32, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I removed the tags - I think the article (though much slimmer) is better off w/o the stuff that was in it at the time I made the above statement. Also, NYT, CNN, etc. should cover the references question. KConWiki (talk) 05:14, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]