Talk:Dylan and Cole Sprouse/GA2
GA Reassessment[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- The prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct, this article complies with Wikipedia's Manual of Style.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- See notes below. The sources here are fine (But I have doubts to "Gossip Center.com") and this contains no original research.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- See notes below. This article is quite focused on the subject.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It all seemed preety fair to me.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- I can see that the page is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All the images are tagged and there are no non-free images, see notes below for point b.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
Comments[edit]
- For point Number six, the note is that the current picture of them could be a bit newer, but that is only a proposition.
- The end of Dylan and Cole Sprouse#Acting may leave the reader wanting more, as to what are they doing now, because this ends at 2010.
- I will leave a citation needed tag where references are needed. ([citation needed])
FAIL 
– I have assessed the article and left recommendations, but noone can find what are they doint now and find the citations that are needed in 5 days. I am sorry to say that I have failed this article, Tough luck lads... – Plarem (User talk contribs) 
15:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC)