Talk:Dusk (The The album)

Fair use rationale for Image:The The Dusk.jpg[edit]

Image:The The Dusk.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded 200x200 true low resolution image (taken from Allmusic)--Cdl obelix (talk) 00:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dusk (The The album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Start-Class criteria:

Y An infobox.
Y A lead section giving an overview of the album.
Y A track listing.
Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name.
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year.

B-Class criteria:
Y All of Start class criteria.
Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art.
N At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section).
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs.
N A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.
N A casual reader should learn something about the album.

C-Class criteria:
N All of B-Class criteria.
N A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details.
N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians.
N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.

No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS.

Last edited at 00:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 13:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 31 December 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 22:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– Are The The "the The" (or "The") to apply them WP:THE/WP:THECAPS? © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 21:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Calidum 04:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Upon perusing media sources it appears that the band likes to keep the first "the" uncapitalized if in the middle of sentence. Following the basic rules of the English language, if it's at the beginning of a sentence then the first "The" can be capitalized, and that can be reflected in these album article titles where Sentence Case applies. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: these were all changed as part of a Wikipedia-wide changeover to lower-case "the" in album disambiguation titles, done by Joefromrandb. I asked him for his reasoning at the time, and I'm pinging him because I think it's only fair that he should be made aware of this discussion and allowed to explain his changes. Richard3120 (talk) 17:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If it turns out that the changeover was based on a distinct policy discussion/consensus, then I could change my vote. But this band's odd name might call for an exception. Is Revolver (Beatles album) comparable, when that band's name is actually THE Beatles? ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:19, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.