Talk:Dungiven Castle

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Northern Ireland

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Concerns over article content[edit]

Yesterday I added information to this page which included:-

Henry Carey building the first castle, of which only the bawn walls remain
James McCloskey purchasing the property in 1925
The 2001 British Orienteering Championship
Acts which had appeared in Dungiven Castle
Amongst other additions, I contributed m 6,774 bytes +4,164‎ which @JBW deleted as speedy deletion
I am not happy and I do not agree with this deletion and I want my article reinstated
If there were concerns regarding copyright of the content of the new version of the article, I should have been given the opportunity to remedy this before it was speedily deleted
What gives @JBW the right to delete my whole article without raising their concerns with me first?

~~~~ Sperrins (talk) 06:25, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sperrins JBW is an editor, just like you and me, and they determined that the text violated copyright and removed it. It was not speedy deleted, which involves the deletion of an entire article. Copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, so they cannot be allowed to stand. If you are able to write the text in your own words and provide sources to support it, you may do so. 331dot (talk) 08:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW completely removed the article which I had spent hours researching so I am unable to put it into my own words. It is not even in the deleted log. Sperrins (talk) 08:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you are saying the article is completely removed, it is not. Your edits were removed, but not the entire article. 331dot (talk) 09:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My article was completely removed not the Wikipedia article, It is my article which I researched thoroughly and uploaded. Sperrins (talk) 09:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how this works. Once you click Publish, the edit belongs to Wikipedia. A disclaimer stating this is given near the Publish button. See WP:OWN as well. 331dot (talk) 09:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If it was not copied from elsewhere, discuss that with JBW. 331dot (talk) 10:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sperrins, I don't know what you mean by "article", but what is normally understood by that word in Wikipedia has not been deleted. If you mean your changes to the article, then yes they have been deleted, and that is, as I said, because of copyright infringement. 37% of what you added was word for word identical to text at https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northwest-dungiven-castle-story-not-yet-complete/28141474.html, and the figure is higher than that if we include text with small changes in wording, such as substituting "Glenshane Community Development Limited" for "Glenshane Community Development Group". Wikipedia policy is that copyright-infringing material should be removed immediately, not left hanging around while an editor gets around to changing it. If you don't like that policy you can seek to have it changed, but as long as it is the policy you don't have grounds for complaint because an administrator implements that policy. JBW (talk) 19:48, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]