Talk:Dr. Hun Houses

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

demolished . . . delisted[edit]

For some reason I can't access the quoted source, but unless somebody broke the law, the houses were presumably delisted, then demolished. Not changing it, though. Awien (talk) 17:38, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The very first page of the source is a letter from the Keeper of the Register telling the state that it was unfortunate that they had been demolished and "accordingly, they have been removed from the Register." You have to have JavaScript enabled to read the source. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why ... ?[edit]

This is a nice article, but it poses a few questions: why were the buildings listed (finest examples, notable history, etc), why were the buildings demolished after being listed (public hazard, illegal act, etc) and why were they delisted (listed in error, done-deal once they were demolished, etc)? As I'm not familiar with the location, the DYK hook makes the listing/demolition/delisting details the interesting part of the article.--ML5 (talk) 11:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given that it happened so long ago, sources online were hard to come by. I presume the Times Union from that era might have run stories (if I can get to wherever they are) that would explain why they were torn down (My guess is that the SEIU and CSEA needed the space for their parking lots and no one was interested enough to save the houses).

As for their reason for listing, I think it's sort of evident in the article that they were listed both for the architecture (Outside of the Lafayette Park Historic District, there aren't a lot of Federal style brick houses from that era left in Albany) and Dr. Hun's place in American medical history. Daniel Case (talk) 23:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dr. Hun Houses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]