This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Some mention should be made of his actions in Saigon and his help restoring the French to power (with help from Japanese POWs!) in Vietnam. Tommel 02:30, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll second this. If you read William J. Lederer's "Our Own Worst Enemy" (Norton 1968), you'll find a scathing account of Gen. Gracey's actions in Saigon.
Whether you like it or not, the French were the de facto legitimate government in French Indo-China/Vietnam prior to the Japanese occupation, and it was none of Gracey's business to meddle in the political affairs viz., who ran the country after the expulsion of the Japanese.
As such Gracey was only concerned with restoring the legitimate government, and as the French one was the last legitimate government that existed prior to the war he was obliged to hand over power to them whether he or anyone else liked it or not. Once done, that was his job completed, the future of French Indo-China /Vietnam was someone else's problem, and in effect, none of his or the British Army's business. That's called having an apolitical army, and not meddling in other country's internal affairs.
Gracey's job was to accept power from the Japanese occupiers and then hand it over to the legitimate former rulers of the country, i.e., the one that existed before the outbreak of war. That's It. It wasn't his job to take sides or to preside over whatever infighting there may have been between the French colonial rulers and Ho Chi Minh. That was their business and their problem to sort out.
As such, Gracey behaved quite correctly, and what's more, lawfully, as required by International Law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 18:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
