Talk:Dolores LaChapelle

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Ecology

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

prod[edit]

The primary author, User:Catherine Jo Morgan, seems to be absent. The only other substantive addition was a sentence and a half by User:Seattle Skier. No references other than to Ms. LaChapelle's are given. There aren't a great many that turn up in a simple search -- multiple, independent sources seem to be lacking. If no one else is able to add to the article in three years time, it doesn't seem like it'll ever meet WP:BIO. 66.25.169.151 (talk) 08:06, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plenty of independent reliable sources turn up in a Google Books search. I'm contesting the proposed deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:10, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some sources to the article. I hope that that's enough to demonstrate that the subject was notable for more than being an appendage to her husband. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:01, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ecologist?[edit]

I don't question Dolores's notability, but wonder whether it's correct to categorize her as an "American ecologist." If that designation implies a scientist whose research is in the academic field, perhaps Dolores should be noted here as an author, philosopher, scholar, etc. instead. I tried a search on Google Scholar, and many books and articles came up, but none would be classed as "ecological" in the academic sense, I think. --Araucana (talk) 17:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dolores LaChapelle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060515114928/http://www.lib.utah.edu:80/spc/photo/P981/P0981.html to http://www.lib.utah.edu/spc/photo/P981/P0981.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]