Talk:Doghmush clan

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Romanization[edit]

Shouldn't the proper vowels between D and GH be "a" and between M and SH also be "a"? Badagnani 20:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

durmush[edit]

i believe the lettering is "غ" and thus, pronounced as "ר" under generic languages that don'[t handle this throat letter well. personally, i took the "R" from a highly respected dr. for eastern studies, and was actually surprised to see the english spelling with the "gh" although i'm aware that it's been used for this sound on occassion. Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 15:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English-speaking people can pronounce the Ghain/gh phoneme just fine with about 2 minutes' practice, and it's not an "R" sound, so that text shouldn't state that it's pronounced as an "R." Badagnani 18:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

that's how we write it down (and subsequently pronounce it) in hebrew.^[1] i can't speak for how anyone outside of israel would say the khamula's name, but i tend to think it would either be with an 'R' or with a soft to silent 'H'. anyways, there's certainly room to say that at least one pronunciation is with the "R". Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 20:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be like an "R" in French or Hebrew, but not English. Badagnani 23:18, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok, let me know how an english speaker would pronounce it, and i'll add it to the article. Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 08:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say that, as with Boutros Boutros-Ghali, most English speakers would just pronounce it as a normal "G" (as in "girl"). But it would be wrong. Badagnani 17:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Place of settlement.[edit]

per to this diff/conficlt - [2].

Badagnani, the Ottomans were not using the word Palestine for any of their regional/subdivision distribution in the early 1800s. The territories were mostly divided into Sajaks and Wilayahs. The Gaza strip, was mostly connected to the Jerusalem Sanjak, which at those years (early 1800s) was under the control of the Damascus Wilayah... this is before the Albanian Muhammad Ali captured the wilayah in the 1830s.

Currently, we have no reliable source mentioning the word Palestine for the place of their arrival (see the Turkish source doesn't mention it), and therefore it would be original research to add the western title 'Palestine' to an ottoman sub-province from the early 1800s. I hope my point is clear, awaiting your response.

p.s. (offtopic) I'd appreciate a full translation of the Turkish source, if you can come up with it. Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 12:53, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you know which sajak or wilayah they moved to, just use that name. Otherwise, just use the vernacular name for that coastal strip between Egypt and Lebanon: Palestine. If it's known that they came directly do Gaza and no other part of Palestine, just call it Gaza instead of Palestine. Badagnani (talk) 18:45, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that we don't have a source for what part they settled in. Any idea on what exactly the Turkish source says? Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 21:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

since we do not have a source for "The family originally came to Palestine", i'd be interested in removing it from the article. Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 13:32, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it's known that they came directly do Gaza and no other part of Palestine, just call it Gaza instead of Palestine. Both of these are common, well-understood terms for the pre-nation-of-Israel coastal region. Badagnani (talk) 18:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know that they came directly to gaza and haven't seen a source for this. I've sent a couple emails to Turkish speaking wikipedians asking their help. I hope one-two of them will respond sometime in the near future. Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 19:22, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was given a translation of the related paragraph by a turkish speaking wikipedian and it includes 'gaza'. Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 16:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jaish al-Ummah[edit]

That's a group of al-Qa'ida wannabes in Gaza somewhere. Not the same as Jund Ansar Allah which Hamas has already wiped out. Is Jaish al-Ummah part of the Dugmush complex of gangs? They have rooters but no material backers outside Gaza as far as I know. 209.121.88.198 (talk) 13:04, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

False[edit]

This document provided by dougmush is actually from qatar and has been proven fake . There is currently a civil war in the clan because of the sectors in gaza rebbeling against hamas 2601:602:87E:3CD0:2E24:F03A:A008:6966 (talk) 14:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]