Talk:Disasterpieces

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleDisasterpieces has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 24, 2008Good article nomineeListed
September 16, 2008Good topic candidateNot promoted
November 21, 2008Good topic candidateNot promoted
July 28, 2009Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article


GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Disasterpieces/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

  • What makes the following reliable review sites:
    • http://www.seaoftranquility.org/reviews.php?op=showcontent&id=2715
    • http://www.moviefreak.com/dvd/s/slipknot_a.htm
    • http://www.rockezine.net/asp/rez_areview.asp?ID=862&review=Slipknot%20-%20Disasterpieces%20(DVD)
      • SoT was a printed magazine from 1998 - 2001,[1] but it was originally and is now only a web magazine and has been running since 1995. MovieFreak review a lot of Movies and DVDs and offer an RSS feed of their reviews, it seems to be ran on some kind of submission system by reviewers and features a team of reviewers. I'm also usnure of how a review of a product on a website needs to be "reliable". It's not like an opinion can be contested. REZTER TALK ø 12:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • OK, SoT is fine. The main issue is verifying the fact checking/reliability standards of the source being used; if we allowed any opinion in because it can't be contested (which is true, it can't), we'd be filled with fan reviews. But we don't so we're not - hence we take reviews from reliable sources. A good way to assert reliability is if another reliable source does, or if it's used as a source for a site like Rotten Tomatoes, for instance. I can't see anything indicating reliability here (can you?), and what about Rockezine? —Giggy 12:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
          • Well they are both review sites rand by small teams of reviewers (see RE here) again I'm unclear on how an opinion can be seen as unreliable (and having a reliable source acknowledge it is a bit flimsy IMO) but if need be you can remove them. And if you're going to aks if there are more reviews then I don't think there are because these are all I could find. REZTER TALK ø 12:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could Image:Disasterpieces-Crahan.jpg be replaced by a free image? (Expand the fair use rationale as much as possible if no.)
    • No there is no free images from the performance, what is wrong with the current FUR?. REZTER TALK ø 12:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Nothing terribly wrong; just most image folk like to see a few lines of solid text there for a "satisfactory" FUR. —Giggy 12:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • I have expanded it a bit, but I'm not exactly sure how much more it can be expanded. REZTER TALK ø 12:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Disasterpieces was recorded at the now defunct London Dockland Arena in England on February 15, 2002, it was one of the final dates on the bands European tour which was subsequently their final tour until 2004." - who is "their" referring to?
    • The band.... Slipknot. "it was one of the final dates on the bands European tour which was subsequently their final tour until 2004." REZTER TALK ø 12:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Ooops, sorry, my bad - I totally missed that (I knew it referred to the band from the lead; the point was that a reader might not read the lead... but then I didn't see "the band's" there). —Giggy 12:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "which is all documented on the DVD" - somewhat lax/non-professional prose...
  • Is it possible to split these big paragraphs up into multiple paragraphs?
  • Hmm.... no Blabbermouth.net review?
    • No they have only ever reviewed one of Slipknot's products. REZTER TALK ø 12:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "however it was declared quadruple platinum on November 18, 2005 to become the best selling product from the band to date." - not sure if you should be using "however".... seems like more of an "and" situation...

And please leave me a note when done. Cheers —Giggy 11:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Yeah, they're probably OK, passed. —Giggy 03:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Purity[edit]

Why is an audio-only version of Purity under the music videos sections, if there is no video? I know Purity had to be pulled from one of their albums, but is that the reason Purity is on the DVD in audio-only format? I'm confused. Bramblestar (ShadowClan Leader) (talk) 18:44, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I understand Purity's prescence now. Please archive this discussion. Bramblestar (ShadowClan Leader) (talk) 19:59, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promo Version[edit]

Isn't there a promo version of this DVD? I've seen it on two Youtube videos where users are presenting their collections. If anybody has any information about this version, can you please add it to the article? If it isn't notable enough, you don't need to add it. Bramblestar (ShadowClan Leader) (talk) 19:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have it... lol you've probably seen my video of my collection I put on YouTube. I don't think promo versions of things belong on wikipedia, all they are are things given to shops, TV stations and reviewers. REZTER TALK ø 20:20, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I have seen your videos, and I like them a lot. I'm okay with not having information about the promo here on Wikipedia. Bramblestar (ShadowClan Leader) (talk) 23:54, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

742617000027[edit]

Why does 74617000027 appear on the concert. I thought that was part of the (sic) track. I'm going to check my copy of Disasterpieces and see if this appears as a separate track. Bramblestar (ShadowClan Leader) (talk) 01:13, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was right, 742617000027 is not a separate track. I'm removing it from this page. Bramblestar (ShadowClan Leader) (talk) 01:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Disasterpieces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:28, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Disasterpieces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Disasterpieces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Disasterpieces&oldid=1206981788"